CEO Ownership, External Governance, and Risk-taking
449 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39a488434afec6aebda340fbf1aaf02e8403e17d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- James J. Chrisman
- Jess H. Chua
- Alfredo De Massis
- Danny Miller
- Lloyd Steier
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Isabelle Le Breton-Miller
- Todd A. Gormley
In Strategy and Management
- Lloyd Steier
- C. Mallin
- Danny Miller
- Isabelle Le Breton-Miller
- Angelica Gonzalez
- Jens Hagendorff
- David A. Matsa
- James J. Chrisman
Citations in the corpus
- Corporate Social Responsibility and CEO Risk-Taking Incentives (2016, unknown): “The mean values for community involvement (COMS) and diversity (DIVS) are positive, whereas the average scores 5 Prior studies (Kim and Lu, 2011; Hayes et. al., 2012) suggest that corporate governance factors influence managers’ risk-taking incentives; therefore, we add the percentage of…”
- Governance Mechanisms and Family Firms (2018, background): “Finally, it overlooks the less codified and nonbinding governance pressures that emanate in the institutional environment from the market for corporate control, competitors, and society-at-large (Denis & McConnell, 2003; Kim & Lu, 2011).”
- Women on board: does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? (2016, background): “We also contribute to a broader literature that has documented the relations between firm risk-taking and other corporate governance characteristics, including CEO gender, financial expertise, ownership, compensation and the presence of institutional investors (e.g. Faccio et al., 2014; Wahal and Mc”
- Social Capital and Debt Contracting: Evidence from Bank Loans and Public Bonds (2017, unknown): “3 Cooperative norms are non-religious social norms that constrain narrow self-interest (Knack and Keefer (1997)), limit opportunistic behaviors in transactions (Coleman (1988)), and help to overcome the free rider problem (Guiso, Sapienza, and Zingales (2010)).”
- Playing It Safe? Managerial Preferences, Risk, and Agency Conflicts (2016, background): “Tarhan, 2016), that CEOs’ risk preferences affect their firms’ responses to changes in the firms’ risk environment (Gormley and Matsa, 2011; Panousi and Papanikolaou, 2012), and that executives’ compensation and contracts affect how managers act on their risk preferences (e.g., Hirshleifer and Suh, ”
- Executive Compensation: A Survey of Theory and Evidence (2017, unknown): “A sizeable literature, going back to Morck, Shleifer, and Vishny (1988), relates rm value, usually measured as Tobins Q, to executivesequity incentives (McConnell and Servaes, 1990; Mehran, 1995; Agrawal and Knoeber, 1996; Himmelberg, Hubbard, and Palia, 1999; Demsetz and Villalonga, 2001; Habib ”
- The influence of CEO demographic characteristics on corporate risk-taking: evidence from Chinese IPOs (2016, background): “Kim and Lu (2011) find that a high level of CEOs’ ownership may discourage them from taking risk unless mitigated by strong external governance mechanisms.”
- Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility (2019, unknown): “Moreover, following Kim and Lu (2011), we use Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI, constructed from revenues reported in Compustat database) of market concentration as a proxy for external governance.”