A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,...

By I. C.. 2014

4,013 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38feb14e762aeef385d8c4520ead198007d3e0a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China (2015, background): “The fundamental economic responsibility of a firm is to its stockholders (Friedman 1970; Carroll 1979).”
Effects of corporate social responsibility on customer satisfaction and organizational attractiveness: A signaling perspective (2019, unknown): “The ethical or philanthropic model embraces a firm's more voluntary or discretionary activities of giving back simply because it wants to do what is right for society (Carroll, 1979).”
A Framework of Sustainable Service Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review and Research Agenda (2017, background): “Carroll (1979) [45], Clarkson (1995) [46], and Wood (1991) [47] first put forward social responsibility and a set of evaluation criteria to clarify the concept of social responsibility.”
Corporate Social Responsibility in a Competitive Business Environment (2020, methodology): “Third, employees can also be affected by CSR. Socially and environmentally responsible firms have an advantage in hiring motivated and skilled employees, which yields higher labour productivity (Delmas & Pekovic, 2013; Nyborg, 2014).”
Do Socially Responsible Firms Pay More Taxes (2016, background): “For example, in his model of corporate social performance, Carroll (1979) identifies economic, ethical, legal, and discretionary responsibilities as four basic expectations of CSR. Consistent with Carroll’s model, Kim, Park, and Weir (2012) find evidence that managers engage in CSR activities to…”
Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association between Capabilities and Performance (2013, background): “…regulatory compliance, proactive CSR relates to active and voluntary practices in which a firm engages, above and beyond regulatory requirements, in order to manage social responsibility issues as a competitive priority (Carroll, 1979; Du et al., 2007; Groza et al., 2011; Wilson, 1975).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Quality: International Evidence (2015, methodology): “On the basis of the theoretical contribution of Carroll (1979) and empirical work carried out by Johnson and Greening (1999) and Cox et al. (2004) on the multidimensional nature of CSR, we make use of an aggregate CSR measure that takes into consideration a range of important issues across companies”
The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility (2018, background): “Those with direct influence on the firm are often characterized as primary stakeholders, whereas those with only indirect influence are typically relegated to secondary stakeholder status (Carroll, 1979; Clarkson, 1995).”
Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing competence and the moderating role of market environment (2015, background): “While studies of CSR posit that firms benefit society in ways that go far beyond financial contributions (Carroll, 1979; Kok, van der Wiele, McKenna, & Brown, 2001), conventional views focus on firms’ responsibility to maximize profits (Friedman, 1970), and profit-seeking activities would seem to…”
Corporate sustainability reporting index and baseline data for the cruise industry (2014, background): “…but growing demand on corporations to perform not only financially but to be good citizens as “the social responsibility of business encompasses the economic, legal, ethical and discretionary expectations that society has of organizations at a given point in time”(Carroll, 1979:500).”
Do LGBT-supportive Corporate Policies Enhance Firm Performance? (2017, unknown): “Although there are a variety of theoretical perspectives of CSR (Carroll, 1994; Garriga & Melé, 2013; McWilliams & Siegel, 2001), the prevailing framework is that of corporate social performance (CSP; Carroll, 1979; Preston, 1978), which is closely tied to stakeholder theory (Donaldson & Preston, 19”
The impact of corporate social performance on the cost of debt and access to debt financing for listed European non-financial firms (2017, methodology): “Although we can consider the CSR construct a part of the broader framework of CSP (Carrol, 1979), this framework represents a way to make CSR applicable and put it into practice, that is, to measure social responsibility in terms of performance (Maron, 2006; Matten, Crane, & Chapple, 2003).”
A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations (2017, background): “In contrast, symbolic actions are intended to alter stakeholder social performance expectations (Carroll, 1979; Davis & Blomstrom, 1966; Mahon & Wartick, 2003), without changing the actual level of the firm’s social performance (cf.”
How Media Coverage of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Increases Financial Risk (2017, unknown): “There is a longstanding debate about firms’ responsibilities towards society (Bowen, 1953; Carroll, 1979), focusing in particular on the relationship between CSR and corporate financial performance.”