Invited Reflection

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding psychology's resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility (2020, unknown): “Intersectionality questions psychol-ogy’s continued valuing of measurement in terms of quantities, given that it is inconsistent with intersectionality’s focus on meaning-making (Bowleg & Bauer, 2016; Marecek, 2016).”
What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously? Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants (2019, unknown): “Other scholars have suggested ways in which engaging with intersectionality could transform psychology (e.g., Bowleg & Bauer, 2016; Cole, 2009; Del Toro & Yoshikawa, 2016; Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016a, 2016b; Marecek, 2016; Rosenthal, 2016; Warner, 2016; Warner, Settles, & Shields, 2016).”
Toward a Psychological Framework of Radical Healing in Communities of Color (2020, methodology): “Drawing on the work of intersectionality scholars, we argue that applying a radical healing framework to counseling psychology research requires attention to the institutional and social–structural context (Bowleg & Bauer, 2016; Cole, 2009; Lewis & Grzanka, 2016).”