Data Collection in Pragmatics Research

By G. Kasper. Culturally Speaking Second Edition, 2000

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3896fdb62ba9f47f3f7838bf5ea3d9e83e017082

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Eva Ogiermann
2. J. C. Félix-Brasdefer
3. Rachel L. Shively
4. W. Ren

Citations in the corpus

• Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests (2009, background): “…normative data, they reliably illustrate the pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic norms of the respondent’s culture (Beebe and Cummings 1996: 75; and Kasper 2000: 329) and provide valuable pragmatic input that can help the foreign language learner “approach the norms for the given L2 speech…”
• Perceptions of Refusals to Invitations: Exploring the Minds of Foreign Language Learners (2008, methodology): “These methods of data collection are commonly employed in ILP research to gather both production (role plays) and perception (verbal reports) data (Cohen, 2004; Kasper, 2000; Félix-Brasdefer, 2007a, b).”