AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF DETERRENCE: CHEATING, SELF‐SERVING BIAS, AND IMPULSIVITY*

By Dan Nagin, Greg Pogarsky. 2003

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3855c161496433453b2456ba6e61afa1b7be550d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Impact of First-Time Imprisonment on Offenders’ Subsequent Criminal Career Development: A Matched Samples Comparison (2009, background): “There is much evidence showing that an important part of the deterrent effect of legal sanctions stems from the expected societal reactions set off by the imposition of legal sanctions (Williams and Hawkins 1986; Nagin and Pogarsky 2003; Nagin and Paternoster 1994).”
Reasons Not to Cheat, Academic-Integrity Responsibility, and Frequency of Cheating (2011, background): “Consequences, particularly the probability of being caught, reduced the likelihood of cheating (Nagin, 2003; Tittle & Rowe, 1973).”
The Effect of Incarceration on Re-Offending: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Pennsylvania (2013, background): “There is much evidence showing that an important part of the deterrent effect of legal sanctions stems from the expected societal reactions set off by the imposition of legal sanctions (Williams and Hawkins, 1986; Nagin and Pogarsky, 2003; Nagin and Paternoster, 1994).”
Integrating the desire–for–control and rational choice in a corporate crime context (2005, background): “More recently, Nagin and Pogarsky (2001, 2003) expand the notion of individual traits to include impulsivity and self-serving bias, concluding that elements of situational and individual differences can be combined into a single analytical framework.”
Self-control Depletion and the General Theory of Crime (2006, background): “The significance of ‘‘cheating’’ for self-control theory should not be underestimated (e.g., Nagin and Pogarsky 2003 ).”
Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Literature (2017, background): “Likewise, behavioral scientists have incorporated the notion that individuals suffer both legal and nonlegal sanctions when they are arrested for committing a crime (Nagin and Paternoster 1994, Nagin and Pogarsky 2003, and Williams and Hawkins 1986).”
Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century (2013, result): “Concerning the first prediction, numerous studies find that increases (or decreases) in perceived apprehension risk are associated with failure (success) in avoiding apprehension (Bridges and Stone 1986; Piliavin et al. 1986; Paternoster and Piquero 1995; Pogarsky, Piquero, and Paternoster 2004; Pog”
Sanctions, Perceived Anger, and Criminal Offending (2004, methodology): “The scenario methodology has been used widely in the social sciences generally, and within criminology in particular, especially to assess rational choice issues (Nagin and Paternoster, 1993; Piquero and Tibbetts, 1996; Loewenstein et al., 1997; Nagin and Pogarsky, 2001, 2003; Bouffard, 2002a, b; ”