Optimization methods for the verification of second order sufficient conditions for bang–bang controls
By Helmut Maurer, Christof Büskens, J. Kim, C. Kaya. 2005
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37e7ea358449fbf0757246bab6f68b210b7ba96f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Local energy minimization in optimal train control (2009, background): “More recently Maurer et al, [17] consider second order sufficient conditions (SSC) which are particularly suited for numerical verification.”
- Reformulations and algorithms for the optimization of switching decisions in nonlinear optimal control (2009, background): “Some authors propose to iterate on the maximum number of intervals until there is no further decrease in the objective function of the corresponding optimal solution, [19, 20, 25 ].”
- On L1‐minimization in optimal control and applications to robotics (2006, background): “[4] and Osmolovskii and Maurer [12, 13] for bang–bang controls.”
- Error bounds for Euler approximation of linear-quadratic control problems with bang-bang solutions (2012, unknown): “Here we use a different approach based on a second-order condition known from the stability analysis [17] of bang-bang controls (compare also [25] [24]).”
- Switching Time Optimization for Bang-Bang and Singular Controls (2010, unknown): “[30] for bang-bang controls.”