Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the local dimension still important?

By R. Deem. 2001

689 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37a071d8886771bb87747853e4c5def41f896815

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The Problem of a Market-oriented University (2006, background): “Amaral et al. 2002; Deem 2001; Hellstro¨ m and Raman 2001; Jacob 2003) more empirical knowledge is needed of the effects of market governance on the functioning of public universities and of the duties that the state and industry require of them.”
Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia (2008, background): “…education in many countries around the world (Burbules and Torres, 2000; Mok and Welch, 2003), although the local dimension also remains important (Deem, 2001; Marginson and Sawir, 2005).1 Higher education systems in both Europe and Asia have recently been going through significant restructuring…”
Why do higher education institutions internationalize? An investigation of the multilevel determinants of internationalization rationales (2016, background): “It is acknowledged that variation in interests and views exist even among members of the same group of actors, such as between academics from different disciplines (Becher and Trowler 2001) and between middle managers and leaders with varying backgrounds and identities (Deem 2001).”
Will the real smart city please stand up? (2008, background): “…‘digital Kyoto’), and knowledge-based cities frequently focus on the relation of universities and academic knowledge and their links to the business world (Slaughter and Rhoades, 2004; Deem, 2001), relations which don’t only depend on ICT infrastructure (although they often do, see Carillo, 2006).”
Varieties of academic capitalism and entrepreneurial universities (2017, background): “…towards commercialization, capitalization and financialization in higher education (on entrepreneurial universities in the twenty-first century, see Deem 2001 and Thorp and Buckstein 2010; on types of enterprise university, Marginson and Considine 2000; and for the lexicon of such institutions,…”
Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union (2012, background): “university systems, to improve economy and efficiency ( Deem 2001, 2004; Deem et al. 2008, Bruno 2009).”
Internationalization as a response to globalization: Radical shifts in university environments (2007, background): “Thus, speaking for changes in the United Kingdom, Deem (2001) considers that, while teaching and research audits were brought in for finance-driven reasons, in some cases they were introduced to reassure the public that universities’ academic standards remain high.”
Global Position and Position Taking: The Case of Australia (2007, background): “Our understanding of the dynamics of the global higher education environment is advanced by “situated case studies” (Deem, 2001; Sidhu, 2004) that examine the transformations talking place in national systems and individual institutions and, in doing so, allow us to focus on the interactions between”
Employing discourse: universities and graduate ‘employability’ (2010, background): “The advent of neoliberalism saw this social contract between universities and society change dramatically (Guston and Keniston 1994; Etzkowitz 1998; Demeritt 2000; Deem 2001; Morley 2001; Boden and Epstein 2006).”