Industrial Development, Globalization and Multinational Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries
By Rajneesh Narula, John H. Dunning. 2000
677 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/373467c69c9ce5a9ada5e6cf026ccb1da9912715
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- K. Meyer
- Rajneesh Narula
- John H. Dunning
- Anabel Marin
- John A. Cantwell
- Axèle Giroud
- Saul Estrin
- Peter Gammeltoft
In Strategy and Management
- K. Meyer
- Rajneesh Narula
- John H. Dunning
- Axèle Giroud
- Saul Estrin
- John A. Cantwell
- Anabel Marin
- Mike W. Peng
Citations in the corpus
- New Competition; Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Development in China (2004, background): “The Chinese model has been increasingly characterised by the collaboration between developmental state and Multinational Corporations (MNCs).”
- Comparative Advantage: Explaining tourism flows (2007, background): “In the most highly developed countries the presence of FDI is more an indicator of competitive rivalry, whereas in less developed countries it is an indicator of technology transfer (Narula and Dunning 2000).”
- Subsidiary roles, vertical linkages and economic development: Lessons from transition economies (2009, background): “In these instances, a lack of human capital and physical infrastructure (Borensztein, De Gregorio, & Lee, 1998; Hoskisson, Eden, Lau, & Wright, 2000; Narula & Dunning, 2000) are daunting obstacles.”
- When does FDI matter? The roles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI (2013, background): “…importance of the topic, there is indeed a mounting need to advance our understanding about the scale and scope of the impacts of FDI on host-countries with different characteristics (Caves, 1996; Dunning & Lundan, 2008; Eden, 2009; Meyer, 2004; Narula & Dunning, 2000; Rodrik, 1999; Wells, 1998).”
- MNEs vertical linkages: The experience of Vietnam after Malaysia (2007, background): “Stage or path theories suggest that MNEs are sensitive to the level of economic development of the host economy, which leads to varying types of FDI and multinational activity (Narula & Dunning, 2000; Ozawa, 1992).”
- Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers (2005, background): “…the first dimension, but it is reflected in the geographical dispersion by MNCs of their subsidiary sources of tech- 3 See, for example, the discussions of ‘social capability’ (Abramovitz, 1991) and the importance of ‘absorptive capacity’ in realising the benefits of FDI (Narula and Dunning, 2000).”
- Do we need different frameworks to explain infant MNEs from developing countries (2012, background): “In many cases, it has not necessarily been strong regulation that has detracted FDI, but the lack of consistent regulation (Narula and Dunning 2000).”
- Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies (2004, background): “They form part of the ‘‘created assets’’ of countries, and have arguably become increasingly significant relative to more conventional ‘‘natural assets’’, like raw materials or cheap labor (Narula & Dunning, 2000; United Nations, 2002).”