Trade creation and trade diversion in the Canada – United States Free Trade Agreement
By Kimberly A. Clausing. 2001
332 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37070a79ad06e51da9314f9c2c3b09d8e41b9c1e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Yoto V. Yotov
- G. Frazer
- James E. Anderson
- Christopher Magee
- Kim J. Ruhl
- Sucharita Ghosh
- Maria Guadalupe
- S. Jayasinghe
In Political Science and International Relations
- Yoto V. Yotov
- Kim J. Ruhl
- James E. Anderson
- Sucharita Ghosh
- Maria Guadalupe
- S. Jayasinghe
- G. Frazer
- Julie Wulf
In Strategy and Management
- Christopher Magee
- Yoto V. Yotov
- Kim J. Ruhl
- James E. Anderson
- Sucharita Ghosh
- Maria Guadalupe
- S. Jayasinghe
- G. Frazer
Citations in the corpus
- The Flattening Firm and Product Market Competition: The Effect of Trade Liberalization on Corporate Hierarchies (2010, background): “tariffs on imports from Canadian firms increased imports from Canada substantially (Clausing, 2001).”
- Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA (2012, unknown): “Clausing (2001) and Head and Ries (2001) find values between 7 and 11.4, Romalis (2007) finds values between 4 and 13.”
- Regional trade agreements: blessing or burden? (2009, unknown): “Moreover, even if members set external tariffs to satisfy the Kemp-Wan criterion, the optimal adjustment of tariffs by the rest of world following the formation of an RTA could leave its members worse off (see Richardson 1995a).”
- Solving the Elasticity Puzzle in International Economics (2003, background): “This mechanism contributes to the seemingly large estimated elasticities found when regressing trade volumes on tariff changes or transportation costs as in Clausing (2001) or Hummels (2001).”
- INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE TAX AVOIDANCE: A REVIEW OF THE CHANNELS, MAGNITUDES, AND BLIND SPOTS (2018, unknown): “Earlier empirical studies show that at the aggregate level, differences in the statutory corporate tax rate between the US and its trading partners substantially influence the balance and pattern of intra-firm trade in the US (Clausing, 2001, 2006).”
- The International Elasticity Puzzle (2008, methodology): “This mechanism contributes to the seemingly large estimated elasticities found when regressing trade volumes on tariff changes or transportation costs as in Clausing (2001) or Hummels (2001).”
- Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990-2002 (2016, methodology): “Clausing (2001) uses a partial equilibrium model disaggregated by sector that links import volume changes to tariff changes for Canada, and does not go on to link them to price changes.”
- Trade deflection and trade depression (2007, unknown): “with the exception of the fixed effects specification (12) in which case the imposition of an AD duty against i is not statistically significant.”
- New measures of trade creation and trade diversion (2008, background): “Clausing (2001) and Wylie (1995) both point out that CGE estimates are very sensitive to the assumptions and parameters built into the model, however.”
- Trade Creating Free Trade Areas and the Undermining of Multilateralism (2005, unknown): “For example, Bohara et al. (2003) and Foroutan (1998) find that free trade agreements have induced lower external tariffs, while Clausing (2001) and Krueger (2000), as well as the results from computable general equilibrium models (see Robinson and Thierfelder, 1999), indicate that trade creation…”
- Are regional trading arrangements trade creating?: An application of extreme bounds analysis (2004, background): “For instance, using commodity level trade data for Canada and the United States, Clausing (2001) finds an insignificant coefficient on the RTA dummy in a gravity model framework, but finds trade creation effects through a reduction in bilateral tariff rates.”
- Trade Growth under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (2010, background): “1% and the expected impact is likely to be much smaller.(7)”