Are regional trading arrangements trade creating?: An application of extreme bounds analysis
By Sucharita Ghosh, Steven Yamarik. 2004
353 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a339205e441fb56879640432e4b9669c902b89df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Yoto V. Yotov
- J. Bergstrand
- S. Baier
- James E. Anderson
- Mario Larch
- D. Novy
- Dimitrios A. Tsamboulas
- Matthew G. Karlaftis
In Strategy and Management
- J. Bergstrand
- James E. Anderson
- S. Baier
- Yoto V. Yotov
- Dimitrios A. Tsamboulas
- Matthew G. Karlaftis
- Konstantinos L. Kepaptsoglou
- Miklós Koren
Citations in the corpus
- The Gravity Model Specification for Modeling International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreement Effects: A 10-Year Review of Empirical Studies (2010, background): “Ghosh and Yamarik [84] showed that gravity models based on cross-sectional data yield unstable results.”
- Reciprocal Trade Agreements in Gravity Models: A Meta-Analysis (2010, neutral): “Ghosh and Yamarik (2004) show that the trade-creating effect is highly sensitive to the choice of other variables included or excluded from the gravity model.”
- New measures of trade creation and trade diversion (2008, background): “Finally, the use of fixed effects eliminates the need to choose which variables to include as controls in the regression, and thus it alleviates the criticism of Ghosh and Yamarik (2004) that the researcher's prior beliefs are influencing the results presented.”
- Measuring Trade and Trade Potential: A Survey (2007, neutral): “1 Harrigan (2001) and Anderson and van Wincoop (2004) contain comprehensive reviews.”
- Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990-2002 (2016, background): “Ghosh and Yamarik (2004) perform extreme-bounds analysis to support the claim that the FTA effects on trade flows are fragile and unstable.”
- Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade? (2007, background): “Other studies in international trade have had similar seemingly implausible results.2 The fragility of estimated FTA treatment effects is addressed directly in Ghosh and Yamarik (2004).”