Mass Hysteria: Critical Psychology and Media Studies

By L. Blackman, Valerie Walkerdine. 2000

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Embodying Affect: Voice-hearing, Telepathy, Suggestion and Modelling the Non-conscious (2010, background): “This is despite the fact that, through the histories of the psychological sciences, the instinctual and automatic have been considered as a problem of the over-suggestible masses; of pathology, abnormality and a dangerous permeability (see Blackman, 2007b, 2008a; Blackman and Walkerdine, 2001).”
Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising (2008, unknown): “The third literature that is significant for this article is poststructuralist writing about the discipline and regulation of the feminine body and feminine subjectivity (Bartky, 1990; Bhaskaran, 2004; Blackman and Walkerdine, 1996; Bordo, 1993; Butler, 1990; Elam, 1994; Sawicki, 1991; Walkerdine et”
Trends in the Turn to Affect (2015, background): “His, and similar depictions of the crowd, were an attempt to understand the popular masses and revolutionary mobs feared by members of the ruling elites and seen as dangerous and threatening (Blackman and Walkerdine, 2001).”
Reinventing psychological matters: the importance of the suggestive realm of Tarde's ontology (2007, background): “This work, particularly in European mass psychology, was specifically concerned with the problem of how to govern populations in light of particular understandings of crowd psychology or ‘suggestibility’ (Moscovici 1985; Blackman and Walkerdine 2001).”