Decision mode, information and network attachment in the internationalization of SMEs: A configurational and contingency analysis
By J. Child, Linda Hsieh. 2014
207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
There has been limited attention to the internationalization of SMEs as a decision, and how the use of contrasting decision modes is associated with different information use and patterns of network attachment. This paper offers a new and systematic analysis of the likely associations between decision modes, information use, and network attachment among internationalizing SMEs. The analysis is subsequently contextualized in terms of two contingencies – the knowledge domain of the SME and the international experience of its key decision-maker. By focusing on the relation between a relatively neglected subject – decision modes – and other issues that have been more center-field, the paper contributes to an analytic synthesis in the field of SME internationalization research.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/362c8b99a4881eb0752645b29900fddeb31812d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Katrina M. Brownell
- Joel Adams
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Rose Narooz
- J. Child
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Dimo Dimov
- Matthew S. Wood
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Networking responses to different levels of institutional void: a comparison of internationalizing SMEs in Egypt and the UK (2017, background): “…SMEs should extend beyond present emphases on the individual and firm levels in terms of factors such as entrepreneurial experience and firm sector (Child & Hsieh, 2014), and take into account as well the socioeconomic environment in which the SME is embedded (Lu, Liu, Wright & Filatotchev, 2014).”
- What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency (2020, background): “…1997, 2005; Zahra & George, 2002); ability—for example, some agents have resource availability (Evers & O’Gorman, 2011) and access to information (Child & Hsieh, 2014); institutions—for example, variance across agents in perceptions of regulatory differences and institutional pressures…”