Resurgence in Ice Nuclei Measurement Research
By P. DeMott, O. Möhler, O. Stetzer, Gabor Vali, Z. Levin, M. Petters, M. Murakami, Thomas Leisner, U. Bundke, H. Klein and 16 more. 2011
234 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/361fe4d9af95bcc6b197d9bba7086a9a5d1ab5d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models (2017, unknown): “While the representation of microphysical processes is much more refined in large-scale microphysics schemes, icephase processes remain diversely represented due to limitations in our understanding, particularly with regard to ice formation processes.(134,135) In models explicitly representing aeros”
- Improvements to an Empirical Parameterization of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation and Its Comparison with Observations (2013, background): “Since then there has been a resurgence of observations about ice nucleation (DeMott et al. 2011, hereafter D11).”
- A New Ice Nucleation Active Site Parameterization for Desert Dust and Soot (2017, background): “Between 245K and the homogeneous freezing temperature, the parameterization is linearly extrapolated, because DeMott et al. (2011) showed no leveling off of the ice active fractions from different measurements with Saharan dust.”
- Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles (2017, background): “This can cause secondary ice particle production, which has been identified as a likely explanation of the high ICNCs observed in field measurements (DeMott et al. 2011; Heymsfield and Willis 2014 and references therein).”
- Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models (2014, background): “These microphysical processes have also been proven difficult to measure both in the laboratory and in the field over the years [e.g., DeMott et al., 2011].”
- Different contact angle distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric Model version 5 (2014, unknown): “In order to reduce the complexity encountered in natural mineral dusts, many laboratory studies have, on the one hand, often used commercially available minerals, in particular kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite (Hoose et al., 2008; Hoose and Möhler, 2012). On the other hand, other laboratory exp”
- Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts (2019, background): “Mixing State Impacts on Ice Nucleating Particles (INPs) It has long been known that particles, called ice nucleating particles (INPs), enable the heterogeneous freezing of the droplets at temperatures above those required for homogeneous freezing (Dufour, 1862; DeMott et al., 2011; Schaefer, 1949).”
- Secondary Ice Production: Current State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future (2016, unknown): “While the understanding and quantification of primary ice nucleation has experienced a renaissance in recent years (e.g., DeMott et al. 2011), SIP is a process that has received less attention but is potentially important for controlling the ice crystal concentrations found in some types of clouds.”