Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models
By P. Ceppi, F. Brient, M. Zelinka, D. Hartmann. 2017
323 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c838b13befdb92eb494ea34cfaa703a09e57587d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- K. Carslaw
- Pierre Gentine
- Manuel Schlund
- S. Sherwood
- B. Murray
- A. Lauer
- Veronika Eyring
- Paul R. Field
In Global and Planetary Change
- K. Carslaw
- Pierre Gentine
- Manuel Schlund
- S. Sherwood
- B. Murray
- A. Lauer
- Veronika Eyring
- Paul R. Field
Citations in the corpus
- Emergent constraints on equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5: do they hold for CMIP6? (2020, background): “In the CMIP5 ensemble, cloud feedback is the main contributor to the spread in ECS with low-level clouds in tropical subsidence regions dominating the spread in cloud feedback (e.g. Ceppi et al. (2017)).”
- Opinion: Cloud-phase climate feedback and the importance of ice-nucleating particles (2020, background): “But, when the amount of supercooled water in the present-day climate was increased to be more consistent with satellite data, the ECS increased to 5.3 ◦C. Similarly, Frey and Kay (2018) showed that ECS increased from 4.1 to 5.6 ◦C when they increased the amount of supercooled water to better match o”