New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Expanding and Evaluating Motives for Environmentally Responsible Behavior

By R. Young. 2000

557 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3619ec691e0a338b37cb08d4cfae7074bba0410d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. L. Steg
2. C. Klöckner
3. K. Keizer
4. Lorraine Whitmarsh
5. G. Perlaviciute
6. John Th⊘gersen
7. J. Bolderdijk
8. E. Matthies

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. L. Steg
2. C. Klöckner
3. K. Keizer
4. R. Gifford
5. G. Perlaviciute
6. Lorraine Whitmarsh
7. John Th⊘gersen
8. J. Bolderdijk

In Marketing

1. L. Steg
2. K. Keizer
3. C. Klöckner
4. John Th⊘gersen
5. Lorraine Whitmarsh
6. G. Perlaviciute
7. J. Bolderdijk
8. N. Kaida

Citations in the corpus

• Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation Guiding Environmental Behavior (2011, background): “The power of self-efficacy as intrinsic reinforcement has been highlighted by De Young (2000), who indicates that we must not assume that because people know what to do, they ought to know why they should do it and how to behave.”
• UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits (2009, methodology): “We evaluated participants’ level of environmental concern using De Young’s scale of 1 to 5 [12].”
• Pathways to Action Competence for Sustainability—Six Themes (2013, result): “…responsible action as concerns theoretical assumptions and criteria for sampling, this study supports findings of sociopsychological studies (De Young, 2000; Kaplan, 2000; Stern & Gardner, 1981; Zavestoski, 1998) in which self-esteem, self-efficacy, participation/belongingness, authenticity,…”
• Psychological and Situational Influences on Commuter-Transport-Mode Choice (2005, background): “The relatively strong influence of egoistic beliefs on proenvironmental behavior in the current study is consistent with two recent articles (De Young, 2000; Kaplan, 2000) suggesting the possibility of proenvironmental behavior being motivated by egoistic values, beliefs, and attitudes.”
• Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals (2003, background): “And finally, experiments that try to make their interventions challenging, interesting, or enjoyable are using intrinsic motivation (De Young, 2000).”
• Environmental Sustainability at Work: A Call to Action (2012, unknown): “…& Olsen, 1991; Schultz, Gouveia, Cameron, Tankha, Schmuck, & Franěk, 2005), environmentally responsible behaviors (see Borden & Schettino, 1979; De Young, 2000; Iwata, 2002; Kaplan, 2000), environmentally significant behaviors (see Gatersleben, Steg, & Vlek, 2002; Stern, 2000), pro-ecological…”
• Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social–Psychological Perspective (2013, background): “…to improved performance in a variety of activity domains (Deci and Ryan 2002, 2008), including environmental responsibility (Dwyer et al. 1993, De Young 2000, Séguin et al. 1998, Pelletier 2002) and policy compliance (Tyler 1990, Kerr et al. 1997, Sutinen and Kuperan 1999, Cantor and Terle 2010).”
• Saving electricity – For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing (2015, background): “When performing an environmentally friendly behaviour, a person may gain knowledge and skills, which will increase the likelihood for this person to show further pro-environmental behaviour (De Young, 2000; Thøgersen, 1999).”
• The positive psychology of sustainability (2012, background): “In addition, Dickerson et al. (1992) have shown that the induction of emotional discomfort and consciousness of hypocrisy, both as consequences of anti-environmentally acting, result in increased pro-ecological behaviors.”