Unrestricted race: A new model of syntactic ambiguity resolution.
By Roger P. G. van Gompel, Martin J. Pickering, Matthew J. Traxler. 2000
81 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35e496f8160d1c675383a235c4d0afdb5d7a8edd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jamie Pearson
- Roger P. G. van Gompel
- Edward Gibson
- Simon P. Liversedge
- Hartmut Fitz
- Martin J. Pickering
- John C. J. Hoeks
- Harm Brouwer
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jamie Pearson
- Edward Gibson
- E. Chen
- Florian Wolf
- Simon P. Liversedge
- Roger P. G. van Gompel
- Martin J. Pickering
- Hartmut Fitz
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Jamie Pearson
- Edward Gibson
- E. Chen
- Florian Wolf
- Simon P. Liversedge
- Roger P. G. van Gompel
- Martin J. Pickering
- Hartmut Fitz
Citations in the corpus
- Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. (2012, background): “Many theories of language comprehension claim that there is a tight coupling between syntactic and semantic processing (e.g., Frazier, 1987; MacDonald et al., 1994; McRae et al., 1998; van Gompel et al., 2000).”
- Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. (2005, background): “van Gompel et al. / Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 284–307 285”
- Lexical and syntactic ambiguity as a source of humor (2004, background): “…ambiguity have appeared in the fields of psycholinguistics and computational linguistics (e.g., Hirst 1987; Franz 1996; Clifton et al. 1994; van Gompel et al. 2000; Ravin and Leacock 2000; Gorfein 2001), the focus of the research was not so much on the phenomena generating ambiguity but…”
- Online Syntactic Storage Costs in Sentence Comprehension. (2005, result): “These results are consistent with gathering evidence that suggests that the human sentence processor is serial in nature, stochastically following the best interpretation at each choice point (Gibson, submitted; Traxler et al., 1998; van Gompel, Pickering, & Traxler, 2000, 2001 ).”