Increasing global crop harvest frequency: recent trends and future directions

By D. Ray, J. Foley. 2013

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The world’s agricultural systems face the challenge of meeting the rising demands from population growth, changing dietary preferences, and expanding biofuel use. Previous studies have put forward strategies for meeting this growing demand by increasing global crop production, either expanding the area under cultivation or intensifying the crop yields of our existing agricultural lands. However, another possible means for increasing global crop production has received less attention: increasing the frequency of global cropland harvested each year. Historically, many of the world’s croplands were left fallow, or had failed harvests, each year, foregoing opportunities for delivering crop production. Furthermore, many regions, particularly in the tropics, may be capable of multiple harvests per year, often more than are harvested today. Here we analyze a global compilation of agricultural statistics to show how the world’s harvested cropland has changed. Between 2000 and 2011, harvested land area grew roughly 4 times faster than total standing cropland area. Using a metric of cropland harvest frequency (CHF)—the ratio of land harvested each year to the total standing cropland—and its recent trends, we identify countries that harvest their croplands more frequently, and those that have the potential to increase their cropland harvest frequency. We suggest that a possible ‘harvest gap’ may exist in many countries that represents an opportunity to increase crop production on existing agricultural lands. However, increasing the harvest frequency of existing croplands could have significant environmental and social impacts, which need careful evaluation.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Food Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3591ce5bd3d8bd4ca758b1868cdcfe9496823c5c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

  1. Pete Smith
  2. Paolo D'Odorico
  3. L. Rosa
  4. Tobias Kuemmerle
  5. Anubhav Jain
  6. Tomás Václavík
  7. Jianliang Huang
  8. T. Garnett

In Food Science

  1. E. Röös
  2. M. Patel
  3. Pete Smith
  4. Paolo D'Odorico
  5. L. Rosa
  6. T. Garnett
  7. Maria Cristina Rulli

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

  1. C. Kremen
  2. Paolo D'Odorico
  3. L. Rosa
  4. Matthias Baumann
  5. Tobias Kuemmerle
  6. T. Garnett
  7. A. Bondeau
  8. Maria Cristina Rulli

Citations in the corpus