Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance

By S. Skippon, M. Garwood. 2011

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda (2015, methodology): “In consumer EV adoption literature, scholars assert that symbols and self-identity also play significant roles in consumer adoption behavior and intentions (Skippon and Garwood, 2011; Graham-Rowe et al., 2012; Axsen et al., 2012; Schuitema et al., 2013; Burgess et al., 2013).”
Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: The case of a U.K. workplace electric-vehicle study (2013, result): “, 2007), or personality (Skippon and Garwood, 2011).”
The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values (2017, background): “One perspective is the focus on the attributes, particularly the instrumental attributes of EVs (Ozaki and Sevastyanova, 2011; Skippon and Garwood, 2011; Egbue and Long, 2012; Carley et al., 2013; Krupa et al., 2014).”
Conspicuous conservation: The Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides (2014, background): “This is particularly true of owners of hybrid and electric-powered vehicles (Gjøen and Mikael, 2002; Heffner et al., 2006, 2007; Turrentine and Kurani, 2007; Skippon and Garwood, 2011).”