Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS
By Himanshu Gupta, Mukesh Kumar Barua. 2017
491 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34e3166253e9f855213db4ac678f5c4a8ba2ef5a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
In Marketing
- Seyed Jafar Sadjadi
- Mahdi Karimi
- Jafar Rezaei
- W. S. V. Roekel
- Lori Tavasszy
- Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong
- Joseph Sarkis
- Himanshu Gupta
In Strategy and Management
- Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong
- Jafar Rezaei
- Seyed Jafar Sadjadi
- Mahdi Karimi
- Himanshu Gupta
- W. S. V. Roekel
- Lori Tavasszy
- Joseph Sarkis
Citations in the corpus
- A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology (2018, background): “The term green and sustainable innovation has been used interchangeably in the literature, with similar theoretical underpinnings (Hall 2002; Wagner 2008; Klewitz and Hansen 2014; Gupta and Barua 2017).”
- Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method (2018, methodology): “BWM has also been used for supplier selection and supplier segmentation (Gupta and Barua, 2017; Rezaei et al., 2015, 2016).”
- Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach (2018, methodology): “Gupta and Barua (2017) used BWM and The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Hwang & Yoon, 1981) for green supplier selection among SMEs.”
- Selection of biomass thermochemical conversion technology in the Netherlands: A best worst method approach (2017, background): “…2016), and has been successfully applied in several real-world applications such as supplier segmentation (Rezaei et al., 2015), supplier selection (Gupta and Barua, 2017; Rezaei et al., 2016), evaluating barriers of technological innovation (Gupta and Barua, 2016), evaluating success factors of…”