Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A lexicon
By R. Pirard. 2012
257 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d12daa355440fa99aece88323ccac16c6acbcfb7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Corbera
- Bram Büscher
- R. Fletcher
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
- R. Muradian
- J. Dempsey
- A. Hejnowicz
- G. Hecken
Citations in the corpus
- Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It” (2016, background): “…that many if not most PES schemes fail to perform like actual markets (McAfee and Shapiro 2010; Fletcher and Breitling 2012; Milne and Adams 2012; Pirard 2012; Boisvert, M eral, and Froger 2013; Fletcher 2013; Lapeyre and Pirard 2013; Muradian et al. 2013; Muradian and G omez-Baggethun 2013;…”
- The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “Others have called for more precision in the use of the terms ‘market-based’ and particularly ‘market-based instruments’ (Pirard 2012; Corbera, 2015), given that in the overarching literature ‘the terms “economic instruments”, “market-based mechanisms”, “incentive-based instruments”, “environmental…”
- Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, background): “The application of market-based incentive (MBI) mechanisms to deal with the challenges of landscape and environmental protection, climate mitigation, wetland restoration and biodiversity conservation is growing (Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2010; Muradian and Rival, 2012; Pirard, 2012).”
- In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “With the perspective gained after years of analysis on how PES operate on the ground, nowadays we know that most schemes that are labeled under this also vague rubric are far from meeting the conditions of a market transaction (Pirard, 2012; Muradian and Gómez-Baggethun, 2013).”
- Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies (2015, background): “Agricultural policies such as agri-environmental programs can account for a more balanced supply of ES from agriculture (Power, 2010; Pirard, 2012).”
- Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence (2015, background): “Economic incentives have increasingly gained prominence in environmental policy as a means to promote biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation1 (Vatn, 2010; Pirard, 2012; WBCSD, 2011).”
- Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions (2013, background): “The debate includes discussions about their nature and typology (Pirard 2012), the conditions under which they are effective (Lockie 2013) and their social implications (McAfee 2012).”