Intrasexual competition among women: Vocal femininity affects perceptions of attractiveness and flirtatiousness

By D. Puts, J. L. Barndt, Lisa L. M. Welling, Khytam Dawood, R. Burriss. 2011

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/349a626d905e8b00c9b26c274c13c62140922b2e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. B. Jones
2. Anthony C. Little
3. Susan C. Roberts
4. Casey A. Klofstad
5. David Feinberg
6. Alexander Todorov
7. Christopher Y. Olivola

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. David Feinberg
2. B. Jones
3. Casey A. Klofstad
4. Anthony C. Little
5. Susan C. Roberts
6. Julieanne Connely
7. L. DeBruine
8. J. Vukovic

In Marketing

1. David Feinberg
2. B. Jones
3. Anthony C. Little
4. Casey A. Klofstad
5. Susan C. Roberts
6. L. DeBruine

Citations in the corpus

• Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell (2011, background): “Our data for voices are also consistent with other recent demonstrations that men prefer more masculine female voices for short- than long-term relationships (Puts et al. 2011).”
• Candidate Voice Pitch Influences Election Outcomes (2016, background): “For women, higher-pitched voices are perceived as more attractive (Collins & Missing, 2003; Feinberg et al., 2005b; Puts et al., 2011), whereas lower-pitched female voices are perceived as more dominant (Borkowska & Pawlowski, 2011; Jones et al., 2010).”