When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view

By Elitsa R. Banalieva, K. Eddleston, Thomas M. Zellweger. 2015

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3473a7126ff273f11713407248a4aa80a90ceea4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes (2018, methodology): “In an attempt to integrate the role of context in our framework, we focus on two broad categories of contexts (Banalieva, Eddleston, and Zellweger, 2014): first, the exo context, which refers to the economic, social, political, legal, cultural, spatial, and technological environment; second, the…”
Family Business Growth Around the World (2020, background): “…demonstrated that the institutional environment matters for the strategies (Brinkerink & Rondi, 2020) and financial performance of family firms (Banalieva et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2010), we demonstrate which national institutions boost family firm growth, showing that firms grow faster in…”
Institutional deterioration and entrepreneurial investment: The role of political connections (2017, background): “This paradox has led to much interest in studying China's startups (Pistrui et al., 2001; Yang and Li, 2008) and the role of its institutional environment in affecting firm performance (Banalieva et al., 2015; Kshetri, 2007; Peng and Jiang, 2010).”
Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis (2018, background): “This study, therefore, leverages a dynamic institution-based view to provide a more comprehensive theoretical account of the link between internal corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance (Banalieva et al., 2015; Meyer and Peng, 2016; Peng, 2004).”