State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2011

By L. Reed. 2011

590 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3460b160c1e9da27ce074b54d1f0c9845eef035b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Access to Finance (2010, unknown): “Results from the first two trials, from urban India and the Philippines, challenge popularly held assumptions about the use of credit.”
Audit Quality and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Microfinance Industry (2012, unknown): “The Microfinance Industry The microfinance industry has become large; at the present time, this industry provides microcredit to a total of more than 200 million individuals (Maes and Reed, 2012), more than 500 million poor families have a savings account (Christen et al.”
Do Powerful CEOs Determine Microfinance Performance (2012, unknown): “Whereas in the early 1980s, microfinance institutions served only a few million clients, they reached more than 190 million families in 2009 (Reed, 2011).”
Impact of Village Savings and Loan Associations: Evidence from a cluster randomized trial (2016, background): “However, the history of rural ﬁ nancial intermediation is not encouraging, and even the explosive global growth in micro ﬁ nance has been concentrated in urban and semi-urban areas (Allen and Panetta, 2010; Daley-Harris, 2009; Demirgüç-Kunt and Klapper, 2012).”
Determinants of the Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “Whereas in 1997 these MFIs had around 10 million clients, in 2010 this number had grown to over 200 million (Reed, 2015).”
Group versus Individual Liability: Long Term Evidence from Philippine Microcredit Lending Groups (2009, unknown): “…microenterprises, informal economies, access to finance I. Introduction Group liability is often cited as a key innovation responsible for the expansion of access to credit for the poor in developing countries (Morduch 1999; Armendariz de Aghion and Morduch 2005; Microcredit Summit Campaign 2005).”
Scale economies and input price elasticities in microfinance institutions (2013, unknown): “Most MFIs are small, reach only a few thousand clients, remain costly to operate and risk drifting toward better-off clients (Daley-Harris, 2009; Mersland and Strøm, 2010).”
Social efficiency in microfinance institutions (2009, background): “Daley-Harris (2004) surveys 3000 MFIs, where 67.7% of their borrowers were among the poorest, although this percentage varies between institutions.”