Social efficiency in microfinance institutions

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach (2015, methodology): “Total assets that show little variability in the short term (Hunter and Timme, 1995) has widely been used in early empirical studies as an input variable to measure the efficiency of MFIs (Gutierrez-Niéto et al., 2009; Piot-Lepetit and Nzongang, 2014) as well as of commercial financial institutions ”
Green Microfinance: Characteristics of Microfinance Institutions Involved in Environmental Management (2013, background): “in terms of size, status, maturity, performance, or mission (Gutiérrez-Nieto et al. 2009).”
Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance institutions:a Data Envelopment Analysis application (2015, methodology): “…CR IP T AC CE PT ED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11 hence production approach is applied herein, as in many DEA microfinance studies (e.g. Fluckiger & Vassiliev, 2007; Gutiérrez-Nieto et al., 2009; Gutiérrez-Nieto et al., 2007; Haq et al., 2010; Hassan & Sanchez, 2009; Kipesha, 2012; Sedzro & Keita, 2009).”
Do microfinance institutions accomplish their mission? Evidence from the relationship between traditional financial sector development and microfinance institutions’ outreach and performance (2013, background): “In a later paper, Gutiérrez-Nieto et al. (2009) confirm a trade-off between social and financial efficiency.”