Risk and need assessment in British probation: the contribution of LSI-R

By P. Raynor. 2007

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34390b630397f4ed606da887f8708f1db6e6bd24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Maurice Vanstone
2. Pamela Ugwudike
3. J. Skeem
4. F. McNeill
5. P. Raynor
6. K. Douglas
7. Maro Siranosian
8. Sarah M. Manchak

In General Health Professions

1. Maurice Vanstone
2. Pamela Ugwudike
3. F. McNeill
4. P. Raynor
5. J. Skeem
6. Maro Siranosian
7. Sarah M. Manchak
8. K. Douglas

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Skeem
2. Maurice Vanstone
3. Pamela Ugwudike
4. F. McNeill
5. K. Douglas
6. Maro Siranosian
7. Sarah M. Manchak
8. P. Raynor

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of skills in probation work: A reconviction study (2014, methodology): “This is the form of offender assessment routinely used in Jersey, where it has been validated as a reconviction predictor (Raynor 2007; Raynor and Miles 2007).”
• General Risk and Need, Gender Specificity, and the Recidivism of Female Offenders (2010, unknown): “The RNR model has had considerable impact on correctional programming in Canada and in parts of the United States, Europe, and Oceana (McGuire, 2004; National Institute of Corrections, 2004; Raynor, 2007).”
• Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective (2012, background): “…but also in terms of the extent to which rehabilitation’s resources (principally assessment tools and interventions approaches) are sufficiently sensitive to, for example, gender differences and cultural diversity (on which see, for example, Raynor, 2007; Robinson and Crow, 2009: Ch. 6).”
• Does Gender Moderate the Predictive Utility of the Level of Service Inventory—Revised (LSI-R) for Serious Violent Offenders? (2009, result): “First, relative to men, women obtained significantly lower scores than men on Attitudes/Orientations, Leisure and Recreation, and Criminal History (in keeping with Holsinger et al., 2003; Mihailides et al., 2005; Raynor, 2007).”
• The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: A systematic review (2015, unknown): “…22 Risk assessment in female offenders Reasons for their exclusion from the current review included lack of a clear description of female offenders (Raynor, 2007) and the authors changing some of the questions of the risk tool, thereby undermining the tool‘s standardisation (Coulson et al., 1996).”