Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: results of a four-week diary study

By Jeffrey A. Hall, Chong Xing, Elaina M. Ross, Rebecca M. Johnson. Media Psychology, 2019

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT Social media use has a weak, negative association with well-being in cross-sectional and longitudinal research, but this association in experimental studies is mixed. This investigation explores whether social media abstinence leads to improved daily well-being over four weeks of time. Community and undergraduate participants (N = 130) were randomly assigned to five experimental conditions: no change in social media use, and one week, two weeks, three weeks, and four weeks abstinence from social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat). All participants completed a daily diary measuring loneliness, well-being, and quality of day. Results showed no main effect of social media abstinence. The duration of abstinence was not associated with change in outcomes and order of abstinence did not explain variance in outcomes. Results are consistent with trivial effects detected in large cross-sectional research, and call into question the causal relationship between social media and well-being on the daily level.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32ec22293e00442807bba75eec808354d48af584

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. I. Anderson
  2. Wendy Wood
  3. Benjamin Gardner
  4. Phillippa Lally
  5. David T. Neal
  6. Bas Verplanken
  7. Kevin Maréchal
  8. P. Sheeran

In Communication

  1. I. Anderson
  2. Wendy Wood

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. I. Anderson
  2. Wendy Wood
  3. A. Eagly
  4. Benjamin Gardner
  5. Andrea Campbell
  6. M. F. Rivas
  7. Michal Biron
  8. Peter A. Bamberger

Citations in the corpus