Consequences of Male Partner Violence for Low‐Income Minority Women

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Differential Effects of Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence (2005, background): “For example, because women subjected to intimate terrorism are more likely to suffer psychologically, sustain injuries, and miss work, they are at an increased risk of being unable to achieve and maintain self-sufficiency ( Leone, Johnson, Cohan, & Lloyd, 2004 ).”
Victim Help Seeking: Differences Between Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence (2007, methodology): “These differences are consistent with prior research showing that IT is linked to more severe physical and psychological consequences for victims (Johnson & Leone, 2005; Leone et al., 2004).”
Identity Verification, Control, and Aggression in Marriage (2005, background): “Johnson and his colleagues (Johnson 1995; Johnson and Ferraro 2000; Leone et al. 2004) label the former type of aggression common couple violence or, more recently, situational couple violence, and the latter patriarchal or intimate terrorism.”
DIFFERENTIATION AMONG TYPES OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: RESEARCH UPDATE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS (2008, background): “However, the violence and emotional abuse of Situational Couple Violence are not accompanied by a chronic pattern of controlling, intimidating, or stalking behaviors (Leone et al., 2004).”