The Differential Effects of Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence

By Michael P. Johnson, Janel M. Leone. 2005

687 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04b9652b64d58684147375a68815cd4f3b6fc54b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Health

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Does Controlling Behavior Predict Physical Aggression and Violence to Partners? (2008, background): “However, if both men and women use intimate terrorism and common couple violence, it leads one to question why Johnson has chosen to exclude female perpetrators from his analyses (e.g. Johnson 1999; Johnson and Leone 2005 ).”
DIFFERENTIATION AMONG TYPES OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: RESEARCH UPDATE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS (2008, methodology): “Situational Couple Violence is not embedded in a relationship-wide pattern of power, coercion, and control (Johnson & Leone, 2005).”
Victim Help Seeking: Differences Between Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence (2007, methodology): “We found that IT victims were more likely to use multiple formal institutions and other studies show that they are more likely to escape the relationship and to do so multiple times (Johnson, Conklin, & Menon, 2002; Johnson & Leone, 2005).”
Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice (2006, methodology): “This was verified using as assessment of controlling behaviors developed by Johnson and Leone (2005) and used in the Canadian General Social Survey.”
A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications (2016, background): “This type of violence is more severe, occurs more frequently and escalates over time (Johnson & Leone, 2005; Kelly & Johnson, 2008; Leone, Johnson, Cohan, & Lloyd, 2004).”
Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review (2011, methodology): “Well, in the general sample of the Pittsburgh study, the male violence was 89% situational couple violence (Johnson, 2006a), among current marriages in the NVAW it was 85% situational couple violence (Johnson et al., 2008).”
Examining Symmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Adults Using Socio-Demographic Characteristics (2010, background): “…violence (labeled “intimate terrorism” or “patriarchal terrorism” and most arguably involve severe, patterned male-perpetrated domination and abuse against female partners) that involve high levels of perpetrator control (Johnson 1995, 2005; Johnson and Ferraro 2000; Johnson and Leone 2005).”
The Impact and Consequences of Partner Abuse on Partners (2012, background): “…victimized by their partners are also more likely to suffer from physical injuries (e.g., Corrigan, Wolfe, Mysiw, Jackson, & Bogner, 2003; Johnson & Leone, 2005; Sutherland, Bybee, & Sullivan, 2002; Vung, Ostergren, & Krantz, 2009), including potentially lethal injuries (e.g., burns,…”
Self-Reported Communication Variables and Dating Violence: Using Gottman’s Marital Communication Conceptualization (2010, background): “A further distinction between dating and marital couples is that dating violence is often low in severity and mutual in nature, consistent with a situational couple violence classification of IPV ( Johnson and Leone 2005 ).”
Sliding Versus Deciding: Inertia and the Premarital Cohabitation Effect. (2006, background): “On an individual level, one can likewise imagine therapy with a woman who is living with an intimate terrorist (e.g., Johnson & Leone, 2005 ), wherein she might be helped to realize that she is not in the relationship because she made a clear commitment but instead because of inertia.”
Victim or Offender? Heterogeneity Among Women Arrested for Intimate Partner Violence (2006, methodology): “The items selected are also similar to those used in a recent study by Johnson & Leone (2005) .”
A Historical Perspective on Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation (2009, background): “Moreover, some of the children who lacked independent reasons had been alienated by abusive fathers from their non-offending mothers (Johnston, 2005).”