Breakthrough? China's and India's Transition from Production to Innovation

By T. Altenburg, H. Schmitz, A. Stamm. 2008

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/328f21b461eab3e7ac2719bbdac3bdf66191ff33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting (2011, background): “Nevertheless, it is clear that in countries like China and India the ISs or some parts of them are very similar to developed countries’ innovation systems and in some sectors are close to world class standards (Altenburg et al., 2008).”
Sustainability-oriented innovation systems – managing the green transformation (2012, unknown): “According to Dosi (1982), a technological paradigm is a kind of directed research programme aimed at discovering solutions to a specific set of perceived problems.”
An analysis of power dynamics within innovation platforms for natural resource management (2014, background): “Advocates of AIS believe that innovation follows a non-linear process, and that the ‘system’ capacity depends on the ‘density and quality of relationships’ between the innovation agents and supporting institutions (Altenburg, Schmitz, and Stamm 2008, 327).”
Catching-up trajectories in the wine sector: a comparative study of Chile, Italy and South Africa. (2010, background): “The Asian experience points at the relevance of absorptive, innovation and linkage capabilities in domestic firms (Altenburg et al. 2008; Bell and Pavitt, 1993; Lall, 1992, Kim, 1997).”
Innovation Trajectories in Developing Countries: Co-evolution of Global Value Chains and Innovation Systems (2018, unknown): “Both governments have shown a clear commitment to science and innovation, define sector-specific technological targets and allocate resources accordingly’ (Altenburg et al, 2008, p. 337).”
Do Global Value Chains Offer Developing Countries Learning and Innovation Opportunities? (2017, methodology): “Haakonsson (2009) provides evidence of how joint ventures allowed access to knowledge and technology by the domestic companies and entry to the Ugandan market (which would otherwise have been difficult due to intellectual property rights barriers) for the Indian MNEs.”
Product Innovations in Emerging Economies: The Role of Foreign Knowledge Access Channels and Internal Efforts in Chinese Firms (2010, background): “The Indian government encouraged the development of national software technology parks in the early 1990s (Altenburg et al., 2008), and thus, examining knowledge spillovers associated with these parks could indicate the degree to which our results can be generalized to different countries.”
The Emergence of China and India as New Competitors in MNCs' Innovation Networks (2009, background): “…and in patenting point toward an exceptionally fast, exponentially developing capability building process in both countries, with China as the clear frontrunner (see Table 1 and Altenburg et al. 2007; Frietsch 2007; Meckl et al. 2007; Mitra 2007; NSB 2008; OECD 2008b; Stahlecker et al. 2008).”
Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries (2009, background): “Nevertheless, it is clear that in countries like China and India the ISs or some parts of them are very similar to developed countries’ innovation systems and in some sectors are close to world class standards (Altenburg et al., 2008).”
Enhancing innovation in livestock value chains through networks: Lessons from fodder innovation case studies in developing countries (2012, background): “The ‘system’ capacity depends on the ‘density and quality of relationships’ between the innovation producing and using agents, and the support institutions (Altenburg et al. 2008).”