A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction
By John P. Caughlin, T. Huston. 2002
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3288bce68f1cf069c573bf2d5ccd92868a71fc12
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Tamara D. Afifi
- Paul Schrodt
- Paul L. Witt
- John P. Caughlin
- Tamara D. Golish
- Rachel S. Malis
- Daniel J. Canary
- P. Heaven
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Paul Schrodt
- Tamara D. Afifi
- Rachel S. Malis
- Tamara D. Golish
- P. Heaven
- Joseph Ciarrochi
- Lynne A. Smith
- S. Beach
In Social Psychology
- Paul Schrodt
- Tamara D. Afifi
- Paul L. Witt
- John P. Caughlin
- S. Beach
- Tamara D. Golish
- Jenna R. Shimkowski
- F. Fincham
Citations in the corpus
- Demand/Withdraw Communication between Parents and Adolescents: Connections with Self-Esteem and Substance Use (2004, background): “In fact, the inverse connection between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction is so robust that demand/withdraw predicts marital dissatisfaction, even after statistically controlling for exchanges of negative affect ( Caughlin & Huston, 2002 ).”
- “Feeling caught” as a mediator of adolescents' and young adults' avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and non-divorced households (2003, background): “…change occurs (see Caughlin, 2002; Golish, 2003), it has been shown to be representative of distressed couples (Schaap, Buunk, & Kerkstra, 1988) and predictive of relational dissatisfaction (Caughlin & Huston, 2002; Heavey, Christensen, & Malamuth, 1995) and divorce (Gottman & Levenson, 2000).”
- An analysis of the association between topic avoidance and dissatisfaction: comparing perceptual and interpersonal explanations (2002, background): “Christensen and Heavey reported an intraclass correlation of .73 between husbands’ and wives’ reports of demand/withdraw, and Caughlin and Huston (2002) reported an intraclass correlation of .68 for husband demand/wife withdraw.”
- Communication, conflict, and the quality of family relationships. (2004, background): “Caughlin and Huston (2002) found an overall, inverse association between satisfaction and spousal withdrawal in response to partner demands; however, this association was much weaker when there was also a high rate of affectionate behavior in the marriage.”
- A Meta-Analytical Review of the Demand/Withdraw Pattern of Interaction and its Associations with Individual, Relational, and Communicative Outcomes (2014, background): “…2000 194b .545 .370 R .562 .547 C Moore & Florsheim 2001 62 .417 .409 D Vogel & Karney 2002 164b .146 .105 .308 .108 C Caughlin 2002 46 .218 .296 R Caughlin & Huston 2002 90 .467 .685 .669 C Mullett & Stolberg 2002 136 .166 D Uebelacker et al. 2003 127 .494 .274 R .117 .424 W M eta -an a lytica l…”
- Of Memes and Marriage: Toward a Positive Relationship Science (2010, background): “As regards communication patterns, in the context of high affectional expression the demand-withdraw pattern and marital satisfaction are unrelated, but they are inversely related in the context of average or low affectional expression (Caughlin & Huston, 2002).”
- Moderation in the actor-partner interdependence model (2015, unknown): “as in Caughlin and Huston (2002) where”
- Communication Processes that Predict Young Adults’ Feelings of Being Caught and their Associations with Mental Health and Family Satisfaction (2007, background): “…can sometimes facilitate positive relational change (cf. Caughlin, 2002), it typically characterizes distressed couples (Schaap, Buunk, & Kerkstra, 1988) and predicts relational dissatisfaction (Caughlin & Huston, 2002; Heavey, Christensen, & Malamuth, 1995) and divorce (Gottman & Levenson, 2000).”
- Trait emotional intelligence, conflict communication patterns, and relationship satisfaction (2008, background): “Demanding tends to elicit withdrawal which then tends to elicit more demands, and thus, the behaviours are interdependent (Caughlin & Huston, 2002).”