Key issues in the persistence of underrepresented minority students

By D. Carter. 2006

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/327a0cb55b2aa94861d2b727f33fc7de32d9c14e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. G. Crisp
2. Amanda Taggart
3. Amaury Nora
4. R. Wells
5. Frances K. Stage
6. Xueli Wang
7. Esau Tovar
8. S. Gershenfeld

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Wells
2. Amanda Taggart
3. Frances K. Stage
4. Xueli Wang
5. Amaury Nora
6. G. Crisp

Citations in the corpus

• Critical Quantitative Inquiry in Context (2014, background): “John (2006), and Deborah Faye Carter (2006). Additionally, the newer scholars who wrote chapters for this volume advocate for changes in quantitative research methods as well as in educational practice.”
• Why Students Choose STEM Majors (2013, background): “In this sense, the differential participation rates in STEM fields are particularly detrimental because they adversely affect those underrepresented students’ long-term social mobility, thus perpetuating socioeconomic inequality (Carter, 2006).”
• Undergraduate Latina/o Students (2015, background): “Although the proportion of Latina/os earning college degrees continues to increase (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012), the above-mentioned conditions surrounding and within the K-12 and college environments continue to disadvantage Latina/o students’ opportunity to be successful in college.”