Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scales

By S. R. Ross, S. Millis, Terri L. Bonebright, Steven E. Bailley. 2002

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3277e2577615324c895a5cf6f5bf4d2947e71f93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. C. Jackson
2. Dirk Smits
3. P. De Boeck
4. Luke D. Smillie

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. C. Jackson
2. Andrew D. Lawrence
3. John D. Beaver
4. Andrew J. Calder
5. L. Alloy
6. Dirk Smits
7. P. De Boeck
8. Luke D. Smillie

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. C. Jackson
2. Andrew D. Lawrence
3. Len Dalgleish
4. Andrew J. Calder
5. L. Alloy
6. D. Fresco
7. Dirk Smits
8. P. De Boeck

Citations in the corpus

• From BIS/BAS to the big five (2006, background): “In line with this interpretation, BASR, but not BASD and BASF, was often found to be positively correlated with BIS (Harmon-Jones, 2003; Heubeck et al., 1998; Johnson, Turner, & Iwata, 2003; Ross, Millis, Bonebright, & Bailey, 2002 ).”
• Individual Differences in Reward Drive Predict Neural Responses to Images of Food (2006, methodology): “Although some research has used a BAS " total " score, structural equation modeling has shown that the three BAS measures do not form a unitary global measure of appetitive motivation and should be treated as separate scales (Ross et al., 2002).”
• Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective (2006, background): “Do Carver and White’s three BAS scales relate to a common construct? A number of studies using Confirmatory Factor Analysis have concluded that RR, Fun and Drive reflect distinct but related constructs (e.g., Heubeck, Wilkinson, & Cologon, 1998; Leone, Perugini, Bagozzi, Pierro, & Mannetti, 2001; R”
• A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures (2006, result): “The evidence to this point is mixed regarding the relative adequacy of fit of two-factor versus four-factor structural models of the scales, though there is an emerging consensus in favor of the four-factor model (Heubeck, Wilkinson, & Cologon, 1998; Jorm et al., 1999; Leone et al., 2001; Ross, Mil”