The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework

By Jeff Baker. 2012

1,055 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/325ef79455000d7f48e8b2267fa41e7ecd12af05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Ming-Lang Tseng
2. Maolin Ye
3. Boumediene Ramdani
4. Chunguang Bai
5. Ni Liu
6. Yuan Pan
7. D. Williams
8. Feng Li

In Strategy and Management

1. Joseph Sarkis
2. Chunguang Bai
3. Ming-Lang Tseng
4. Maolin Ye
5. Boumediene Ramdani
6. Ni Liu
7. Yuan Pan
8. D. Williams

Citations in the corpus

• Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: A multi-perspective framework (2013, background): “Given that technology adoption is complex and context sensitive, different factors in the technological, organisational and environmental context can vary across different innovations (Baker, 2011; Troshani et al., 2011).”
• The adoption of artificial intelligence in employee recruitment: The influence of contextual factors (2021, methodology): “Primarily, the original constructs of the contextual factors are relatively generic and obsolete (Baker, 2011; Wang et al., 2010).”
• Social commerce adoption using TOE framework: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian SMEs (2020, background): “The TOE framework classifies technology, organisation and environment as the three sets of factors that affect an organisation adopting innovations (Baker, 2012).”
• SMEs' adoption of enterprise applications: A technology-organisation-environment model (2013, methodology): “TOE framework has been used to explain the adoption of various innovations (Baker, 2011) including: interorganizational systems (e.”
• Big data analytics adoption: Determinants and performances among small to medium-sized enterprises (2020, background): “One of the elements is relative advantage (Baker, 2012; Kapoor, Dwivedi, & Williams, 2015) in which the intention of most organizations may be profoundly affected by the perceived advantage that new technology can add to the particular performance of an organization (Gu, Cao, & Duan, 2012).”
• A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology (2019, background): “These three elements include the technological, organisational, and competitive and other environmental context (Baker 2012; Tornatzky, Fleischer, and Chakrabarti 1990).”