Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations

By J. Hollingsworth. 2000

387 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31e45bf38d4a593b2d0b2abffb802aea92e4f180

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience (2015, background): “This comes close to the notion of institutional complementarity (Amable 2000; Hollingsworth 2000; Hall and Soskice 2001), which is about institutions that reinforce each other and make one another more efficient (see also Grillitsch 2014).”
The Technological Resilience of U.S. Cities (2014, background): “Existing institutions in regions provides opportunities but also sets limits on the types of new growth paths that can be developed, depending on whether they are coherent with existing institutions operating across various spatial scales (Amable 2000; Hollingsworth 2000; Hall and Soskice 2001; Thel”
The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China (2017, background): “The role of industry-specific institutional policy Industrial sectors are coordinated and governed by a unique configuration of regulatory arrangements (Hollingsworth, 2000).”
Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster (2004, background): “The concept institution has in fact caused considerable confusion and misunderstanding due to a fragmented approach across a variety of disciplines and sub-disciplines (Rogers Hollingsworth, 2000).”
“Low‐Tech” Innovations (2008, background): “…crucial importance are also the specific structures of corporate governance which, together with the dominant outside financing, have facilitated long-termoriented investment and innovation strategies and a public economic and technology policy aimed at these core sectors (cf. Hollingsworth, 2000).”
Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: an explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities (2010, background): “The different levels of institutional structures [43] draw attention to the different aggregation levels by which institutions work.”
Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism (2004, background): “For Hage and Hollingsworth (2000) the essential point is a number of separate specialized areas connected to each other through an innovation network.”
Organizational Learning in Multinationals: R&D Networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK* (2003, background): “One would also expect US firms to have a stronger inclination than Japanese firms to develop globally distributed R&D networks because of the national innovation system's focus on achieving scientific breakthroughs and radical innovation (Doremus et al., 1998; Hollingsworth, 2000).”
The Role of the State in Explaining the Internationalization of Emerging Market Enterprises (2015, positive): “Institutional variations across industries Because each industry is coordinated by a unique configuration of institutional arrangements (Hollingsworth, 2000), there are significant institutional variations across industries.”
Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada (2008, background): “…institutions, including the innovation support infrastructure (Hamdouch and Moulaert 2006), and the informal and formal institutions such as the norms, rules, habits and values influencing how innovation is processed and structured in the regional environment (North 1990, Hollingsworth 2000).”