Complements or Substitutes? Private Codes, State Regulation and the Enforcement of Labour Standards in Global Supply Chains

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Analyzing (2019, methodology): “…a situation as described above into consideration, it is an object of the present technology to provide a reception apparatus and a receiving method by which enhancement of the representation capacity of a platform profile for describing an additional function to an application in the HbbTV…”
Do codes of conduct improve worker rights in supply chains? A study of Fair Wear Foundation (2015, background): “On the other hand, stiff competition among export manufacturers in developing countries have led to poor working conditions and lax environmental standards in the factories producing for global brands (Locke et al., 2013).”
Drivers and barriers to reshoring: a literature review on offshoring in reverse (2017, background): “If we draw from research in business ethics it is established that non-compliance with agreements is especially troublesome in countries with poor public regulatory systems (Locke et al., 2013; Toffel et al., 2014).”
Codes in context: How states, markets, and civil society shape adherence to global labor standards: Codes in context (2015, background): “Several empirical studies have identified institutions that promote or hinder the effective implementation of global labor standards in supply chain factories (e.g. Rodríguez-Garavito 2005; Locke & Romis 2007; Seidman 2007; Kocer & Fransen 2009; Locke et al. 2013).”