Primates--a natural heritage of conflict resolution.

By D. Waal, B. Frans. 2000

424 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30fd088e919002dddb1be53f824ab527a8da45a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. David C. Geary
2. J. Vigil
3. Jennifer byrd-craven
4. John F. Dovidio
5. R. Brown
6. Stephanie L. Brown
7. David Lusseau
8. M. Del Giudice

In Social Psychology

1. Arie Nadler
2. Jennifer byrd-craven
3. John F. Dovidio
4. David C. Geary
5. R. Brown
6. Stephanie L. Brown
7. David Lusseau
8. R. Sapolsky

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John F. Dovidio
2. Arie Nadler
3. Adam M. Grant
4. David C. Geary
5. R. Brown
6. René Bekkers
7. D. Schroeder
8. J. A. Piliavin

Citations in the corpus

• Are subordinates always stressed? A comparative analysis of rank differences in cortisol levels among primates. (2003, background): “This diversity appears to reflect, among other things, the extraordinary variety of primate social systems, which often constitute striking exceptions to hierarchical pecking orders (Dunbar, 1988; Strier, 1996; de Waal, 1989) and include complex, affiliative relationships that ameliorate responses t”
• Evolution and development of boys’ social behavior (2003, background): “Although conflicts of interest occur, relationships among kin are generally associated with nepotism, high levels of cooperation, muted aggression, and tolerance of non-reciprocal relationships (Daly & Wilson, 1988; de Waal, 2000; Hamilton, 1964; Trivers, 1974; West, Pen, & Griffin, 2002).”
• Evidence for social role in a dolphin social network (2006, background): “These influences often result in the emergence of complex social behaviour (Arnold and Whiten 2003; Watts 1998; Watts 2002) and social structure (Hinde 1976; Kappeler and van Schaik 2002; Koenig 2002; Wells et al. 1987) which facilitate the decision-making process and often the need to reach consens”
• TARGET ARTICLE: Selective Investment Theory: Recasting the Functional Significance of Close Relationships (2006, positive): ““Dependent on the species, postconflict reunions may include mouth-to-mouth kissing, embracing, sexual intercourse, clasping the other’s hips, grooming, grunting, and holding hands” (de Waal, 2000, p. 587).”
• The Role of Agency and Morality in Reconciliation Processes (2015, background): “In conclusion, unlike the study of conflict resolution (in the sense of addressing concrete conflict-related issues), the scientific study of reconciliation, both within and outside psychology (e.g., de Waal, 2000), is relatively young and requires much additional research.”
• Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. (2005, background): “For instance, prosocial behavior may be an integral component of forgiveness, which is an important contributor to stable relationships (Ripley & Worthington 2002), and a key element of reconciliation, which strengthens collective identity and action (de Waal 2000).”
• Short-Term Benefits of Play Behavior and Conflict Prevention in Pan paniscus (2006, neutral): “…stable social units use conflict management strategies such as communicative displays, dominance relationships, and greeting gestures to mitigate tension and prevent escalation of aggression (Aureli et al., 2002; de Waal, 1992, 2000; Preuschoft and van Schaik, 2000; Whitham and Maestripieri, 2003).”