From I to we: Social identity and the collective self.

By M. Hogg, Kipling D. Williams. 2000

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30f13d7e89dc23f0d46c86e49be6ef6a939b822a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. David de Cremer
3. Barbara van Knippenberg
4. M. Hogg
5. P. Bordia
6. E. Hobman
7. Yang Woon Chung
8. Katharine H. Greenaway

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. David de Cremer
3. Barbara van Knippenberg
4. M. Hogg
5. Yang Woon Chung
6. P. Bordia
7. E. Hobman
8. Gray Atherton

Citations in the corpus

• Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda (2004, background): “At the collective level of selfconstrual, self-conception is referred to as social identity (Hogg & Abrams, 1988; Tajfel & Turner, 1986) or collective self (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Hogg & Williams, 2000; Sedikides & Brewer, 2001).”
• ScholarWorks @ UTRGV ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (background): “In ridge regression, the coefficient values of irrelevant SNPs and genes to a target gene shrink to zero (but not exactly zero) while those of eQTLs and regulator genes of a target gene tend to be higher.”
• Social Identity Reduces Depression by Fostering Positive Attributions (2015, background): “In contrast, thinking about one’s social identity shifts attention away from the self as an individual (Hogg & Williams, 2000; Turner & Onorato, 1999) and toward (generally positive) group memberships (Turner, 1982).”
• The Role of Team Identification in the Dissimilarity-Conflict Relationship (2006, background): “Thus, individuals who have a different demographic profile or different work values will be less socially attractive to other members, and they may experience negative social interaction (Chattopadhyay, 1999; Chattopadhyay & George, 2001; Hogg & Williams, 2000).”
• A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS IN ORGANIZATIONS (2003, background): “The former delineates one’s personal identity and personal self, whereas the latter delineates one’s social identity and collective self (Hogg & Williams, 2000; Sedikides & Brewer, 2001; but cf. Brewer, 2001; Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
• How Moving Together Binds Us Together: The Social Consequences of Interpersonal Entrainment and Group Processes (2019, background): “This can be through interpersonal attraction, the perception of a shared social category, and a shared positive interdependence towards achieving a common goal (Allport, 1954; Gartner, Mann, Murrell, & Dovidio, 1989; Hogg & Williams, 2000; Rabbie & Horwitz, 1969).”
• The role of person–organization fit and perceived organizational support in the relationship between workplace ostracism and behavioral outcomes (2017, background): “By contrast, when individuals perceive themselves to be less prototypical, they believe they are less socially attractive and are more likely to think they are members of the out-group within the organization (Hogg and Williams, 2000).”