The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology

By Peter C. M. Molenaar, C. G. Campbell. 2009

1,018 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30d58866c4973257a5dfee9076adee12ca596853

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Repeated Measures Correlation (2017, background): “For patterns at one level of analysis to generalize to another, the data must be ergodic between levels (Molenaar, 2004; Molenaar and Campbell, 2009).”
Self-Actualizing People in the 21st Century: Integration With Contemporary Theory and Research on Personality and Well-Being (2018, background): “Recently, personality psychologists have returned to the origins of the field, furthering our understanding of the whole person (DeYoung, 2015; Fleeson, 2012; McAdams & Pals, 2006; Molenaar & Campbell, 2009; Sheldon, 2004; Sheldon, Cheng, & Hilpert, 2011).”
Social Media Use and Adolescents’ Well-Being: Developing a Typology of Person-Specific Effect Patterns (2020, neutral): “Only when processes at the group level and individual level are ergodic (i.e., when the sample is homogenous and stationary), statistical findings at the group level generalize to the individual level (Molenaar, 2004; Molenaar & Campbell, 2009).”
The Contribution of Complex Dynamic Systems to Development (2011, background): “The generalizability of these studies relates to how they link to an underlying theory (Molenaar & Campbell, 2009; Yin, 2009).”
Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits (2020, background): “But the extent to which this is appropriate needs to be studied not presumed (e.g., Molenaar & Campbell, 2009; Fisher et al., 2018).”
Mental Disorders as Causal Systems (2015, background): “That is, they often fail to satisfy the theorems of ergodicity (Molenaar & Campbell, 2009).”
Cybernetic Big Five Theory. (2015, background): “…allows the identification of factor structures like the Big Five) places no necessary constraints on intrapersonal covariance structure (the tendency for a person to be in certain states at or near the same time—e.g., talking, socializing, and being excited) (Molenaar & Campbell, 2009).”
Within-person analyses of situational interest and boredom: Interactions between task-specific perceptions and achievement goals. (2014, background): “…much methodological work has argued that between-person approaches, both conceptually and mathematically, provide little information about situational effects that occur within individuals (i.e., within-person effects)(e.g., Borsboom, Mellenbergh, & van Heerden, 2003; Molenaar & Campbell, 2009;”
Identifying Highly Influential Nodes in the Complicated Grief Network (2016, neutral): “Findings based on interindividual variation only correspond to findings based on intraindividual variation under very specific conditions that are rarely met in psychological research (i.e., the assumption of ergodicity rarely holds; Molenaar & Campbell, 2009).”