Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory

By Jason Glynos, D. Howarth. 2007

1,005 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/304cbe6d849e6dc78a3d9a27c374c68182ddd658

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Y. Stavrakakis
2. Lincoln Dahlberg
3. Jason Glynos
4. P. M. Bal
5. E. Dóci
6. Ken Hyland

Citations in the corpus

• Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market (2013, neutral): “…theory has much in common with other interpretative or critical approaches to policy analysis which focus on the construction of social reality and the symbolic use of language within policy debates (Taylor 1971, Edelman 1977, 1988, Gusfield 1981, Lakoff 2004, see also Glynos and Howarth 2007).”
• Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’ (2011, background): “Rather, my reconstruction develops from a critical-interpretative approach that sees knowledge and social objectivity as constituted through the contingent and contextual articulation of meanings and practices into (seemingly) coherent and convincing wholes (Glynos and Howarth, 2007).”
• “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse (2018, background): “This may plausibly be related to what has been perceived by some as an increasing scientism in the social sciences with a more hard science orientation in their dominant methods and approaches (e.g. Glynos & Howarth, 2007).”
• Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology (2018, background): “Glynos (2008, 2011)) differentiates three logics through which ideology permeates the workplace: political, social and fantasmatic logic (Glynos & Howarth, 2007).”
• Lacan and Political Subjectivity: Fantasy and Enjoyment in Psychoanalysis and Political Theory (2008, methodology): “More specifically, we articulate a logic of fantasy with reference to existing work that links post-structural political theory and psychoanalysis in an explicit and systematic way (Laclau and Mouffe, 1985; Žižek, 1989; Laclau, 1990; Laclau, 2005; Stavrakakis, 2005; Glynos and Howarth, 2007).”