The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain

By Judy B. Bernstein. 2008

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30374f8c576c10862183d74817c4941bb0638371

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Gabi Danon
2. Jason Rothman
3. I. Landau

In Language and Linguistics

1. Gabi Danon
2. Jason Rothman
3. Roumyana Slabakova
4. Eloi Puig-Mayenco
5. Jorge González Alonso
6. Alejandro Cuza
7. S. Montrul
8. Maria Polinsky

Citations in the corpus

• L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model (2011, background): “…soldiers’ (set-denoting interpretation) (kind-denoting interpretation) To account for the lack of ambiguity in adjective interpretation in Romance languages compared to English, I offer for now, following Bernstein (1993, 2001) and others, the following projection structure for Romance languages.”
• Agreement and DP-Internal Feature Distribution (2011, background): “…by means of a plural marker, -ès (feminine)/-s (masculine), which is found on prenominal adjectives. is is illustrated in the following example from Bernstein 2001: (5) dès some vètèsgreen.fm.pl ouh door ‘some green doors’ Bernstein claims that in Walloon, unlike in many other languages, there is…”