Base Rates of Malingering and Symptom Exeggeration

By W. Mittenberg, Christina L. Patton, Elizabeth M. Canyock, D. Condit. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2002

1,027 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/300b432bc7b4e2e8ca195ec61d02d384dfe33baf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. G. Young
2. R. Kamphaus
3. Megan Foley Nicpon
4. S. Assouline
5. Allen Ruby
6. E. Doolittle

In Epidemiology

1. R. Ruff
2. Jeffrey Barth
3. A. Tröster
4. N. Pliskin
5. C. Silver
6. S. Koffler
7. C. Reynolds
8. S. Bush

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. G. Young

Citations in the corpus

• Malingering in Forensic Disability-Related Assessments: Prevalence 15 ± 15 % (2015, background): “Evidence Reference to the actual research conducted by Mittenberg et al. (2002) revealed several inconsistencies.”
• Symptom validity assessment: practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. (2005, background): “The potential for symptom fabrication or exaggeration is higher in forensic contexts than in many clinical contexts (Larrabee, 2003; Mittenberg, Patton, Canyock, & Condit, 2002 ).”