Mixed Methods Sampling A Typology With Examples

By C. Teddlie, Fen Yu. 2016

3,375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f84250d22bcc15fdda74a2f878e67ab0e67483e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In General Health Professions

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Sampling in Qualitative Research: Insights from an Overview of the Methods Literature (2015, background): “As with Patton (Patton, 2015) and others (e.g., Teddlie & Yu, 2007), we consider the terms purposeful and purposive sampling to be equivalent.”
Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods (2007, background): “…manner in which the research questions are developed (participatory vs. preplanned), • two types of sampling procedures (e.g., probability and purposive; see Teddlie & Yu, 2006 [this issue]), • two types of data collection procedures (e.g., focus groups and surveys), • two types of data (e.g.,…”
Resources and bridging: the role of spatial context in rural entrepreneurship (2018, methodology): “The ventures were selected according to a sequential sampling strategy (Flick 1998) that employs a gradual selection principle where ‘the sample evolves of its own accord as data are being collected’ (Teddlie and Yu 2007, 80).”
Impact of a University Recreation Center on Social Belonging and Student Retention (2011, background): “Convenience sampling entails extracting information from a population that is both easy to access and agreeable to participate in a study (Teddlie & Yu, 2007).”
A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social and Health Science Research (2007, methodology): “Teddlie and Yu (2007) referred to this balancing act in qualitative sampling as the representativeness/saturation trade-off.”
Editorial: Developing Publishable Mixed Methods Manuscripts (2007, neutral): “They might, for example, address topics such as the procedures for conducting mixed methods research (see Teddlie & Yu, 2007); provide new insight into philosophical assumptions, worldviews, or paradigms in mixed methods research (see Morgan, 2007); contribute to understanding the use of inferences…”
Does Corporate Governance Affect Sustainability Disclosure? A Mixed Methods Study (2018, background): “, individuals, groups of individuals, institutions) based on specific purposes associated with answering a research study’s questions [57].”
Using Movies in EFL Classrooms: A Study Conducted at the English Language Institute (ELI), King Abdul-Aziz University. (2016, methodology): “The present study employed a convenience sampling method to select participants, which entails “drawing samples that are both easily accessible and willing to participate in a study” (Teddlie & Yu, 2007, p. 78).”
Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool (2015, background): “Here one might decide to use purposive sampling (see Teddlie & Yu, 2007), i.e. specifically recruit participants with the relevant characteristics for instance by approaching a relevant mental health service or advertising through social media.”
An investigation into native and non-native teachers' judgments of oral English performance: A mixed methods approach (2009, methodology): “For the teacher samples, a concurrent mixed methods sampling procedure was used in which a single sample produced data for both the quantitative and qualitative elements of the study (Teddlie & Yu, 2007).”
The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions (2015, background): “It is therefore vital for intervention developers to consider who they need to talk to, so that they can purposively sample [46] a diverse range of users who vary in characteristics that are considered important.”
Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption (2014, methodology): “To ensure broad representation (Teddlie and Yu, 2007), three adult participants active in household purchases were chosen to represent each of the four combinations created by gender (male; female) and two age groups (less than 35; 35 or above).”
Types of sampling in research (2019, methodology): “We would be thinking sometimes that – Why there is a need of sampling? the answer is as it is too expensive and too time consuming to survey a whole population in a research study, we use sampling [Figure 1].[1-5]”