Resource description framework (RDF) schema specification
By D. Brickley, Ramanathan V. Guha. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mark A. Musen
- Natasha Noy
- Steffen Staab
- Siegfried Handschuh
- Billy Pik Lik Lau
- Ray W. Fergerson
- M. Vargas-Vera
- Jérôme Euzenat
Citations in the corpus
- A survey of data fusion in smart city applications (2019, background): “To date, there are few common ontology languages have been developed such as Delivery Context (DCN) [231], Web Ontology Language (OWL) [232], Resource Description Framework Schema (RDFS) [233], Semantic Sensor Network (SSN) [234], and others.”
- PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment (2000, background): “Ontologies today are available in many different forms: as artifacts of a tedious knowledge-engineering process, as information that was extracted automatically from informal electronic sources, or as simple " light-weight " ontologies that specify semantic relationships among resources available on”
- Authoring and annotation of web pages in CREAM (2002, methodology): “Analogously to the way that RDFS:LABEL is used, we use three types of de.nitions in order to specify the default pointing behavior for class instances, exploiting the XPointer candidate recommendation [7].”
- Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions (2001, methodology): “For example, to define the class of chairs in RDF Schema (Brickley and Guha, 2000), one uses <rdfs:Class ID="Chair">.”
- MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup (2002, background): “RDF ([14], [20]) and RDFS [2] provide the basic framework for expressing metadata on the web, while current developments in webbased knowledge representation, such as DAML+OIL (reference description of the daml+oil can be found at http://www.”
- Relationships and data sanitization: a study in scarlet (2010, methodology): “There are many ontology languages including OWL-Lite, OWL DL, OWL Full [30], OWL 2 [39, 63], RDF Schema [22], SADL [61], DAML+OIL [43], and CASL [9, 62].”
- Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema (2002, background): “As can be seen, a number of dependencies arise due to the storage of Schema information in separate tables.”
- Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology (2001, methodology): “The WWW Consortium (W3C) is developing the Resource Description Framework (Brickley and Guha 1999), a language for encoding knowledge on Web pages to make it understandable to electronic agents searching for information.”
- Ontology Evolution: Not the Same as Schema Evolution (2004, unknown): “The use of metaclasses—classes which have other classes as their instances [7]—in many systems (e.g., Prot´eg´e-2000 [21], Ontolingua, RDFS [5]) blurs or erases completely the distinction between classes and instances.”
- The Knowledge Model of Protégé-2000: Combining Interoperability and Flexibility (2000, methodology): “The RDF and RDF Schema specification define the knowledge model that will be used to express ontologies in RDF (RDF schema [1]) and the syntax to encode and instantiated the schema (RDF syntax [10]).”
- Learning to match ontologies on the Semantic Web (2003, unknown): “Many formal languages to specify ontologies have been proposed for the Semantic Web, such as OIL, DAML+OIL, OWL, SHOE, and RDF [owl,BKD · 01,dam,HH01,BG00].”
- Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protégé-2000 (2001, methodology): “Category (1) Concepts in RDFS (2) Concepts in RDFS (3) Concepts in RDFS (4) Concepts in Protégé that are (nearly) identical that can be encoded that do not have an that do not have to Protégé concepts as native Protégé concepts equivalent in native Protégé an equivalent in RDFS”
- Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic (2003, unknown): “From now on, when we talk about RDFS, we will be referring to the DAML+OIL subset of RDFS. DAML+OIL is equivalent to a very expressive DL in fact it is equivalent to the S HOI Q(D) DL [13, 11].”
- Anchor-PROMPT: Using Non-Local Context for Semantic Matching (2001, methodology): “The WWW Consortium is developing the Resource Description Framework (Brickley and Guha 1999), a language for encoding semantic information on Web pages in machine-readable form.”