Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology
By Natasha Noy. 2001
6,037 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c15cf32df98969af5eaf85ae3098df6d2180b637
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Natasha Noy
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- Mark A. Musen
- Charith Perera
- Philipp Cimiano
- Jérôme Euzenat
- Nicole Coviello
- Matthew Horridge
Citations in the corpus
- The Protégé OWL Plugin: An Open Development Environment for Semantic Web Applications (2004, background): “Furthermore, since ontologies may be notoriously hard to build [13], a tool should provide intelligent assistance in ontology construction and evolution.”
- OWL Pizzas: Practical Experience of Teaching OWL-DL: Common Errors & Common Patterns (2004, background): “[15, 6, 2, 7] and numerous works on ontological principles, e.”
- SOUPA: standard ontology for ubiquitous and pervasive applications (2004, background): “org (or classes), properties of each class describing various features and attributes of the class, and restrictions on properties [21].”
- Book Reviews: Ontology-Based Interpretation of Natural Language by Philipp Cimiano, Christina Unger and John McCrae (2014, background): “e semantics of lexical underspecification is analyzed in more depth by Pustejovsky [2009] and the relation between vagueness, ambiguity and underspecification is discussed by Pinkal [1996]. An approach to the resolution of lexical ambiguities based on polaroid words was presented by Hirst [1987].”
- User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management (2002, background): “It should offer advice to user for continual ontology refinement [8, 22].”
- International Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis (2011, background): “For example, Nummela et al. (2004) find that speed of internationalization is adversely affected by having an extended network while Gassmann and Keupp (2007) argue that it is enhanced by a firm being embedded in global communities and social networks.”
- Methods and tools for ontology evolution (2004, background): “Therefore, ontology development is a dynamic process starting with an initial rough ontology, which is later revised, refined and filled in with the details [95].”
- OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis (2005, background): “[10] provides a seven-step guide for developing ontology.”
- Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey (2013, background): “Another acceptable definition has been presented by Noy and McGuinness [136].”
- Knowledge Graphs (2020, unknown): “Early methodologies [157, 202, 387] were often based on a waterfall-like process, where requirements and conceptualisation were fixed before starting to implement the ontology in a logical language, using, for example, an ontology engineering tool [194, 283, 286].”
- TTPDrill: Automatic and Accurate Extraction of Threat Actions from Unstructured Text of CTI Sources (2017, background): “An ontology is a formal description of a certain domain [20].”
- Traceability data management for food chains (2006, background): “Ontology is defined as a coherent set of representation terms together with textual and formal definitions that embodies a set of representation design choices ( Noy and McGuiness, 2000”