Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions

By Michel R. Klein. OIS@IJCAI, 2001

532 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb5b4301cf1cf2872a5af0e234e0088beb470e2b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Distributed Description Logics: Assimilating Information from Peer Sources (2003, background): “Klein [22] provides a recent review of the literature of ontology integration/alignment, which involves relating some of the terms in the two ontologies.”
Ontology Matching (2007, background): “Conceptual heterogeneity, also called semantic heterogeneity in (Euzenat 2001) and logical mismatch in (Klein 2001), stands for the differences in modelling the same domain of interest.”
Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches (2004, background): “[16] M. Klein.”
Meteor-s web service annotation framework (2004, unknown): “Mapping ontologies is a hard problem [19].”
Ontology Evolution: Not the Same as Schema Evolution (2004, unknown): “A number of tools for finding similarities and differences among ontologies in a semiautomated way have recently appeared (Klein 2001).”
Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number : 1072954 Registered office : (2004, background): “In both cases, the ontologies have to be aligned, which means that they have to be brought into mutual agreement (Klein 2001).”
Semantic E-Workflow Composition (2003, background): “and Sheth, 1996), and similar work is being addressed in addressing ontology mismatch (Noy and Musen, 2000; Klein, 2001 ).”
Ontology versioning on the Semantic Web (2001, background): “See for a exploration of ontology language differences and mismatches (Corcho and Ǵomez-Ṕerez, 2000) and (Klein, 2001).”