Moving Personality Beyond the Person-Situation Debate The Challenge and the Opportunity of Within-Person

By Variability William Fleeson. 2016

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f323e5812a6ea64bb071e290253d7e8f096d3ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Whatever Happened to Self-Control? A Proposal for Integrating Notions From Trait Self-Control Studies Into State Self-Control Research (2017, unknown): “In doing so, we acknowledge the work by Fleeson (2004) on trait and state approaches to personality that aims to reconcile opposing views on whether behavior is primarily stable or variable across situations.”
Trait and Daily Emotion Regulation in Social Anxiety Disorder (2016, background): “Global traits are now better understood as averages or ‘‘most likely’’ behaviors for a person across all situations; yet most behaviors vary more within a person than between people (Fleeson 2001, 2004).”
A model for personality at three levels (2015, background): “The effect of group composition on the frequency distribution of extraverted behaviors also is compatible with Fleeson’s analysis of the relationships between state and trait measures of extraversion (Fleeson, 2004, 2007a).”
Whole Trait Theory (2014, background): “Further, we are gratified because we have long seen the potential for social-cognitive mechanisms to be the explanatory account (Fleeson & Jolley, 2006; Fleeson, 2001, 2004, 2007; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012).”
The Dynamic Relationships of Work Affect and Job Satisfaction with Perceptions of Fit (2014, background): “Further, there is growing evidence that self‐perceptions and evaluations of the environment, which comprise the components of a fit judgment, exhibit substantial within‐person variability (e.g., Fleeson, 2004; Fleeson et al., 2002; Yang & Diefendorff, 2009).”
Character: The Prospects for a Personality-Based Perspective on Morality (2014, background): “Response 4: Behavioral variability is real but can be reconciled within a personality framework Fleeson (2004) has argued that recent advances in personality psychology show that both sides of the person–situation debate were correct; people routinely act in a number of ways on a given dimension of…”