Adolescents' emotional affinity towards nature : a cross-societal study
By Markus-Michael Müller, Elisabeth Kals, Ramune Pansa. 2009
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f28c47d13b22dfdde5fef4d14e55fa6f0d7e608
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Silvia Collado
- J. A. Corraliza
- H. Staats
- M. Ruiz
- Tina Braun
- Richard S. Cottrell
- Paul W. Dierkes
- B. Bergman
Citations in the corpus
- Experiencing nature in children's summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences (2013, methodology): “These results are similar to the ones obtained by Müller et al. (2009) in which willingness of proenvironmental commitment was best predicted by EAN.”
- Assessing impacts of locally designed environmental education projects on students’ environmental attitudes, awareness, and intention to act (2016, background): “…(Hungerford and Volk 1990; Kals, Schumacher, and Montada 1999; Kaplan and Kaplan 1989; Kempton, Boster, and Hartley 1996; Kollmuss and Agyeman 2002; Müller, Kals, and Pansa 2009; Schahn and Holzer 1990).2 Increases in eco-impact awareness relate to a contested topic in EE: the merit of teaching…”
- Fostering changes in attitude, knowledge and behavior: demographic variation in environmental education effects (2018, background): “While some researchers found that people who lived in rural areas showed more concern for the environment (Hinds and Sparks 2008; Milfont 2007) other researchers did not find significant differences (Müller, Kals, and Pansa, 2009; Xueying 2014).”
- Effect of frequency and mode of contact with nature on children's self-reported ecological behaviors (2015, background): “Several authors have demonstrated that gratifying direct exposure to nature increases people's emotional connection to it (Cheng & Monroe, 2012; Collado et al., 2013; Hinds & Sparks, 2008) and this emotional link is a predictor of pro-environmental behavior (Müller et al., 2009).”
- Connecting students to nature – how intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs (2017, background): “Denying these effects, Müller, Kals, and Pansa (2009) could not detect differences comparing the degree of connectedness to nature of people who were brought up in the country and those who grew up in the city.”