Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes.

By W. Willett, JoAnn E. Manson, Simin Liu. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2002

761 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The possibility that high, long-term intake of carbohydrates that are rapidly absorbed as glucose may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes has been a long-standing controversy. Two main mechanisms have been hypothesized, one mediated by increases in insulin resistance and the other by pancreatic exhaustion as a result of the increased demand for insulin. During the past decade, several lines of evidence have collectively provided strong support for a relation between such diets and diabetes incidence. In animals and in short-term human studies, a high intake of carbohydrates with a high glycemic index (a relative measure of the incremental glucose response per gram of carbohydrate) produced greater insulin resistance than did the intake of low-glycemic-index carbohydrates. In large prospective epidemiologic studies, both the glycemic index and the glycemic load (the glycemic index multiplied by the amount of carbohydrate) of the overall diet have been associated with a greater risk of type 2 diabetes in both men and women. Conversely, a higher intake of cereal fiber has been consistently associated with lower diabetes risk. In diabetic patients, evidence from medium-term studies suggests that replacing high-glycemic-index carbohydrates with a low-glycemic-index forms will improve glycemic control and, among persons treated with insulin, will reduce hypoglycemic episodes. These dietary changes, which can be made by replacing products made with white flour and potatoes with whole-grain, minimally refined cereal products, have also been associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease and can be an appropriate component of recommendations for an overall healthy diet.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ee743f47166112e03bb857263d0f2aaab0e96b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

  1. F. B. Hu
  2. Vasanti S. Malik
  3. W. Willett
  4. M. Schulze
  5. JoAnn E. Manson
  6. MR Stampfer
  7. F. B. Hu
  8. Christian K. Roberts

In Nutrition and Dietetics

  1. F. B. Hu
  2. W. Willett
  3. Vasanti S. Malik
  4. M. Schulze
  5. JoAnn E. Manson
  6. MR Stampfer
  7. B. Mckevith
  8. S. Dernini

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. F. B. Hu
  2. W. Willett
  3. Vasanti S. Malik
  4. M. Schulze
  5. JoAnn E. Manson
  6. MR Stampfer
  7. F. B. Hu
  8. B. Mckevith

Citations in the corpus