Multi-Sided Platforms

By Andrei Hagiu, Julian Wright. 2015

1,006 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Media Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ed31954b0ad56f837d009e23588edf3513d1b8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Media Technology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control (2018, background): “…as a foundation for constructing complementary products and services (Gawer and Cusumano 2002, 2008; Gawer and Henderson 2007), or as systems for matching buyers and suppliers who transact with each other using system resources (Hagiu and Wright 2015) or sales channels (Ceccagnoli et al. 2012).”
Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature (2020, neutral): “…2013), how comple-mentors and end users respond to a platform’s entry into complements production (Foerderer et al., 2018; Z. Li & Agarwal, 2017; Wen & Zhu, 2019), and when platforms will wisely avoid producing their own complements (e.g., Gawer & Henderson, 2007; Hagiu & Wright, 2015).”
Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants (2018, background): “Whereas vertically integrated firms take control of the interactions between producers and consumers, P2P trading platforms enable direct transactions between users, with the users in control of setting the terms of transactions and delivering goods and services 17 .”
The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation? (2016, positive): “Building on the theory of the firm, they frame these choices as a trade-off between 'being a MSP or a vertical integrated firm ' (Hagiu & Wright, 2015c), or between 'controlling versus enabling' (Hagiu & Wright, 2015a).”
What makes a sustainable business model successful? : An empirical comparison of two peer-to-peer goods-sharing platforms (2018, neutral): “1) typically have low capital and operating costs, higher valuations relative to their revenue and faster growth (Eisenmann et al., 2006; Hagiu and Rothman, 2016; Hagiu and Wright, 2013; Libert et al., 2014; van Alstyne et al., 2016).”
Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy (2019, background): “In contrast, platform business models typically require “curator” leadership practices that emphasize: resource integration whereby leaders design a platform architecture that facilitates building a strong network of service providers who bring their capacity-constrained assets to the platform; reso”
Transaction costs and the sharing economy (2015, background): “In the paper by (Hagiu & Wright, 2011), they differentiate between MSPs, resellers and input suppliers, where MSPs are distinguished by the direct interaction between the different customer groups.”
Explaining Adoption and Use of Payment Instruments by U.S. Consumers (2016, neutral): “Our paper is relevant for the literature on two-sided markets as well (see Rochet and Tirole 2006; Rysman 2009; Hagiu and Wright 2011).”
Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda (2021, background): “In the case of a transaction platform, such as Afristay – a sharing economy platform for accommodation in Africa, a tool might come in the form of valuable additional functionality enabling cleaning services to be located and ordered by a host.”