Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory

By T. Shackelford, Aaron T. Goetz, David M. Buss. 2005

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e955d2bb5f4ecb4f98886511583f7591f9fdebb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. T. Shackelford
2. David M. Buss
3. William F. McKibbin
4. D. Schmitt
5. P. Jonason
6. L. Sugiyama
7. Norman P. Li
8. M. Haselton

In Marketing

1. David M. Buss
2. William F. McKibbin
3. T. Shackelford

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David M. Buss
2. T. Shackelford
3. William F. McKibbin
4. D. Schmitt
5. P. Jonason
6. L. Sugiyama
7. Aaron T. Goetz
8. Norman P. Li

Citations in the corpus

• The Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (MRI-SF) (2008, methodology): “After obtaining men’s and women’s self-reports of mate retention using the 104-item Mate Retention Inventory (MRI; Buss, 1988a, 1988b; see also Buss & Shackelford, 1997; Shackelford et al., 2005), we calculated item-total correlations for each of the 19 tactics (see Table 1).”